« LocWeb 2010: Call for Papers | Main | REST: From Research to Practice »

Wednesday, August 18, 2010


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


JPEG rotation isn't lossless unless a specific set of conditions are met ( http://www.faqs.org/faqs/jpeg%2Dfaq/part1/index.html ). It's kind of a hack that JPEGs could be rotated losslessly at all. EXIF seems a much cleaner and less destructive way to do rotations for compressed images.


i think virtually all cameras fit the constraints on images sizes to allow lossless JPEG rotation, and EXIF is just not part of JPEG, it's an independent add-on. in an ideal world, cameras would store the sensor dump in raw as retrieved from the sensor, but JPEGs always would be rotated internally. EXIF then could be used to capture the fact that the image had been rotated for JPEG encoding. i am wondering whether there is any camera out there that does it like this, but i guess EXIF does not even have the appropriate fields to support this kind of scenario.

practically speaking, i am simply annoyed that after three years of working just fine, i now have people telling me that i am sending them pictures in the wrong orientation. technically speaking i may have the moral upper hand, but it makes little sense for me to tell them that they should dump their email clients and switch to one that works as apple thinks it should work.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)