« Tracking Recovery Sites | Main | iPhone 3.0 »

Monday, March 16, 2009


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Sean Gillies

I disagree with the use of the "simple" GeoRSS profile, which is a gateway to bad practices like multiple locations, but otherwise this is great work.


@sean: thanks for your comment, and you're absolutely right that the guidelines should say that agencies should not use more than one location, if they decide to use GeoRSS. or if agencies were allowed to put in more than one location (maybe one for a point, and one for a polygon for more advanced spatial representations), then these would have to be qualified (but that is currently not allowed by GeoRSS, i am afraid).

which brings me back to the reply i still owe you (and i hope to get back to that thread soon): GeoRSS as it currently exists is not all that great and guidelines like the ones you proposed would be a very useful first step. but overall, i think GeoRSS needs a major revision, cleaning up the location model, producing a well-defined spec, and making the format extensible in a well-defined way. and then we can also start calling it GeoAtom.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)